Treat external models as software supply-chain components: establish provenance, verify artifacts, isolate evaluation, control promotion, and preserve a complete deployment bill of materials.
AI adoption expands the set of third-party artifacts
NIST identifies provenance and AI supply-chain risk as part of adversarial machine-learning security. The UK NCSC’s secure-AI development guidance calls for models, data, libraries, frameworks, modules, middleware, and external APIs to come from verified and well-documented sources.
This is a risk-management brief, not a report of a specific compromised model. Exposure varies with artifact format, source, loading behavior, runtime isolation, and deployment privileges.
A trusted repository name is not complete provenance
A deployment may combine a base model, community adapter, tokenizer, custom inference code, native dependencies, and a container image. Weakness or tampering at any layer can affect confidentiality, integrity, or model behavior. Some model-loading formats may also execute code.
Extend software supply-chain controls to model assets
-
Approve sources and licenses
Define allowed registries, publishers, artifact types, and usage conditions.
-
Record provenance
Capture origin, version, hash, model card, dataset lineage, adapters, dependencies, and evaluation results.
-
Verify before loading
Check signatures or hashes and prefer non-executable serialization formats where possible.
-
Evaluate in isolation
Use a sandbox without production secrets, broad network access, or write access to trusted registries.
-
Control promotion and rollback
Require review before production use, monitor behavior after release, and retain known-good versions.
-
Continuously reassess
Track upstream changes, vulnerabilities, ownership changes, and newly identified behavioral risks.
Read the original guidance
NISTAdversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations ↗UK National Cyber Security CentreGuidelines for secure AI system development: Secure development ↗Defensive recommendations are AI Security Today analysis.
No corrections. Source review updated 11 July 2026.