◆ Executive takeaway

Treat external models as software supply-chain components: establish provenance, verify artifacts, isolate evaluation, control promotion, and preserve a complete deployment bill of materials.

AI adoption expands the set of third-party artifacts

NIST identifies provenance and AI supply-chain risk as part of adversarial machine-learning security. The UK NCSC’s secure-AI development guidance calls for models, data, libraries, frameworks, modules, middleware, and external APIs to come from verified and well-documented sources.

Evidence boundary

This is a risk-management brief, not a report of a specific compromised model. Exposure varies with artifact format, source, loading behavior, runtime isolation, and deployment privileges.

A trusted repository name is not complete provenance

A deployment may combine a base model, community adapter, tokenizer, custom inference code, native dependencies, and a container image. Weakness or tampering at any layer can affect confidentiality, integrity, or model behavior. Some model-loading formats may also execute code.

Extend software supply-chain controls to model assets

  1. Approve sources and licenses

    Define allowed registries, publishers, artifact types, and usage conditions.

  2. Record provenance

    Capture origin, version, hash, model card, dataset lineage, adapters, dependencies, and evaluation results.

  3. Verify before loading

    Check signatures or hashes and prefer non-executable serialization formats where possible.

  4. Evaluate in isolation

    Use a sandbox without production secrets, broad network access, or write access to trusted registries.

  5. Control promotion and rollback

    Require review before production use, monitor behavior after release, and retain known-good versions.

  6. Continuously reassess

    Track upstream changes, vulnerabilities, ownership changes, and newly identified behavioral risks.

Read the original guidance

NISTAdversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations ↗UK National Cyber Security CentreGuidelines for secure AI system development: Secure development ↗

Defensive recommendations are AI Security Today analysis.

Corrections and updates

No corrections. Source review updated 11 July 2026.